[Pauldotcom] Microsoft Patents the "sudo" command
Bert Van Kets
mailing at vankets.com
Tue Nov 17 09:24:44 UTC 2009
They did not patent the sudo command itself. They patented a system that
functions like sudo. Totally different thing.
Still I do not think it would hold up in court.
Bert
Sam Buhlig wrote:
> OK. Maybe I am retarded.....don't answer that. I would just think that
> this would still be applicable.
>
> http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/license.html
>
>
> Could someone maybe explain how this could happen with this still in
> affect.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Don Thomas
> <don.thomas.cissp at gmail.com <mailto:don.thomas.cissp at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> However...
>
> Groklaw brings up some interesting "prior art" and history of sudo.
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111094923390
>
> Anyway, it's an interesting read...
>
> Best regards,
> -dt
> Don Thomas
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Leandro Malaquias
> <lm.net.security at gmail.com <mailto:lm.net.security at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> David A. Gershman wrote:
> > To be legal, I just removed all 'sudo' existence from my
> Linux boxes.
> > >From now on, I'll boot into Windows and double click my
> 'sudo' icon and
> > provide:
> >
> > - the OS to boot into (though only Window 7 and above are
> allowed)
> > - the command to execute (properly corrected by M$ spell and
> > grammar check.)
> > - the user to execute as (corrected to 'administrator')
> > - and the password (shown in the clear, of course)
> >
> > After "completion", I'll get a dialog box with title 'Error'
> and text
> > 'Error'.
> >
> > "Microsoft. Where do you want to go...oh nevermind, we'll
> decide."
> >
> >
> >> Website:
> http://gizmodo.com/5402796/microsoft-patents-the-sudo-command
> >> Patent:
> >>
> >>
> >
> http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,617,530.PN.&OS=PN/7,617,530&RS=PN/7,617,530
> <http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,617,530.PN.&OS=PN/7,617,530&RS=PN/7,617,530>
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pauldotcom mailing list
> >> Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> <mailto:Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com>
> >> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> >> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com <http://pauldotcom.com/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> > David A. Gershman
> > gershman at dagertech.net <mailto:gershman at dagertech.net>
> > http://dagertech.net/gershman/
> > "It's all about the path!" --d. gershman
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> <mailto:Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com>
> > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com <http://pauldotcom.com/>
> >
> >
>
> http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/New-Microsoft-patent-may-put-Linux-security-components-at-risk-857848.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> <mailto:Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com>
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com <http://pauldotcom.com/>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> -dt
> Don Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com <mailto:Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com>
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
More information about the Pauldotcom
mailing list